405 seriously ill Wuhan virus cases were put on
Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromyacin + zinc and 403 saw
dramatic recovery. Only 2 died. That is 0.005%.
Another doctor used this on 2300 cases and I believe there
were no deaths.
What is aggravating is that every mainstream media
discussion, Fauci and the bureaucratic "experts", and even
the WSJ, never mention the efficacy of this treatment. Makes
me very suspicious. There's no money to be made off of
HCQ......or are they just against it because Trump
recommended it? Do they prefer continued deaths so Trump can
be defeated in Nov.? Makes one wonder.
One of the biggest hurdles in dealing with a pandemic caused by a completely new virus is grappling with the sheer amount of unknown information.
In the case of the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV2, this was particularly difficult because the presentation of each patient seemed so vastly different from the previous case.
Furthermore, many patients seemed to improve clinically before deteriorating, requiring an admission to the intensive care unit for weeks at a time. The pernicious behavior of the virus made pandemic response that much more difficult, and the unpredictable nature of the disease consumed and strained health care resources.
Physicians who were treating COVID-19 patients took note and communicated to others by phone call, conference, or social media, but there was no central repository for their experiences, which ensured that the virus spread much faster than information.
Now, approximately four months since the first reported case in America, we are beginning to understand why.
Dr. Thomas Yadegar, a critical care physician for 20 years and now director of the intensive care unit at Providence Cedars-Sinai Tarzana Medical Center in Tarzana, California, has been on the front lines of the pandemic response.
The first time one of his patients deteriorated, he was completely stumped for the first time in his two decades in the ICU.
Many of his patients were in acute respiratory distress. But many other patients were experiencing abnormal coagulation, inflammatory heart disease, and some were even experiencing neurological deficits and weakened muscles.
“I have 20 years of critical care experience, and I can’t explain what just happened to my patient,” Yadegar said.
One evening after an exhausting shift, he sat down and pored over patient charts for all those cases, searching for a common thread. Finally, after one of the worst headaches of his life, he found it.
It was inflammation.
Early in the pandemic, Yadegar’s unit used treatment guidelines that came from doctors around the world, which recommended avoiding anti-inflammatory treatment and recommended early and aggressive use of ventilators to prevent patients from declining further.
But those guidelines were aimed at treating a severe viral
respiratory disease by using a ventilator to assist with
oxygenating the blood while the body uses its inflammatory
pathways to mount a response to the virus.
Those guidelines did not address the treatment for when other
organ systems began to fail.
In fact, using a ventilator is a highly invasive procedure,
and the repeated and forced inspiration of air irritates the
lungs, which feeds back into the inflammatory cycle. Many
patients, once on a ventilator, never recover.
The only way to explain the highly complex disease course
that seems to change from one patient to the next is that the
virus is causing an autoimmune response, in which the body’s
natural defense mechanisms go haywire and begin destroying the
body they’re trying to protect.
The disease course is so unpredictable because every person’s
immune system is unique to that person.
This phenomenon is not unheard of, and a common virus,
Epstein-Barr virus, is known for potentially initiating the
body’s inflammatory pathways to attack the nervous system and
causing Guillain-Barre syndrome.
The main difference with SARS-CoV2 is that it’s much more
efficient at doing this—and often in a catastrophic manner.
Yadegar and the ICU he manages have adjusted their protocols.
Now, patients who test positive in his hospital for SARS-CoV2
are not sent home immediately, but tested for inflammatory
markers.
(Please note this is key to saving lives in hospitals. Testing
for inflammatory markers.)
Those with elevated inflammatory markers are kept in the hospital with a close eye on their oxygen saturation levels. If the patient begins to desaturate, the medical team evaluates the patient before starting a course of steroids and an IL-6 inhibitor.
IL-6 (interleukin-6) is a powerful mediator for the
inflammatory pathway, so an IL-6 inhibitor would prevent a
significant amount of inflammation from happening. Steroids have
strong anti-inflammatory effects and also suppress the immune
system more broadly.
The two of those do not treat the virus, but the potentially
deadly autoimmune response it can cause.
But Yadegar cautioned that “you have to treat each patient
within their own protocol.” Doctors must always treat the
patients in front of them and cannot simply rely on these types
of drugs for all critically ill COVID-19 patients.
That’s because using an IL-6 inhibitor with steroids would
effectively strip the body of its immune response. If there’s a
concomitant infection, which is extremely common in the hospital
setting and even more so if a patient is on a ventilator, then
using this combination of drugs will, almost certainly, kill the
patient.
Still, Yadegar and his team have had remarkable success. They
have not put a patient on a ventilator in at least two weeks,
and the mortality rate in their ICU has been in the single
digits, whereas nationally the mortality rate of critically ill
patients has been
between 40% and 70%.
There’s one thing we have known from the start about the
COVID-19 virus, which is that it’s a tricky and pernicious one.
One of the important things that Yadegar has learned is that
patients admitted to the ICU are often not coming in due to the
direct effect of the virus, but rather from the out-of-control
autoimmune process.
Information like that can only be had from front-line clinicians, and we should do our best to ensure they are heard.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention periodically hosts a Clinical Outreach and Communication Activity, in which clinicians are able to discuss their findings and experiences.
The CDC should be using those frequently to update information about COVID-19 and its multiple disease manifestations and to make the information easily and publicly accessible.
Furthermore, the CDC should be actively seeking this information from the front lines of COVID-19 hot spots, where the most relevant data will be found.
With steps like these, clinicians can be assured of clear
lines of communication that may help drive down mortality rates
in the future and ease the process of reopening the country.
Editor Note:
Why isn't the CDC using their clinical outreach and communication activity to frequently update COVID-19 information and its multiple disease manifestations and making this information easily and publicly accessible??
Under This Doctor’s Care, Most COVID-19 Patients Are Recovering.
Here’s His Unusual Approach.
The
2006 Origins of the COVID-19 - 6 Feet Social Distancing Idea
Disease Mitigation Measures in the Control of Pandemic Influenza
- PDF (10 Pages)
Corona Virus
Risk Calculator
Kevin Pham / @KL_Pham / / 143 Comments
Discussion
Mark K
Free market filly
a day ago