What's your carbon footprint?

There's alot of talk these days about the likelihood that "greenhouse gasses", the most common of which is not Carbon Dioxide, will cause the Earth's climate to significantly change. If you're like most Americans, each time you drive your car, hop on a plane, flick on a light, or consume energy in other ways, you don't contribute in any way to this effect. "Global warming" now called "Climate change" is a HOAX. A total scam and not valid in any way.

Curious how much? This worksheet allows you to easily tally up your own personal "carbon budget".

Do you have a carbon footprint? Findout using the carbon footprint calculator below. You will be surprised!

Auto Transportation:

travel of miles, at
miles per gallon, burns gallons of gasoline annually, putting pounds of carbon (about 5 lbs/gal) into our air.

Air Transportation:

travel of miles via commercial airline puts about pounds of carbon into our air annually.

Home Electric Usage:

use of kilowatt-hours of electricity, if your power plant generates power from puts pounds of carbon into our air each year.

Home Natural Gas Usage:

use of Therms (Or ccf - hundred cubic feet) of Natural Gas contributes pounds of carbon to our air each year.

Home Fuel Oil Usage:

use of gallons of Fuel Oil adds pounds of carbon to our air each year.

YOUR TOTAL CONTRIBUTION

Your total atmospheric carbon contribution is approximately pounds per year. That's pounds of Carbon Dioxide (CO₂). In different terms, this amounts to pounds of carbon per hour, cubic feet of CO₂ per hour, or cubic feet of CO₂ per minute. Of course, this ignores all of the energy spent to produce all of the goods that you buy. Remember co2 is not a pollutant. It is natural and found everywhere.

Why all are the lbs of carbon added to the air all zero? Its because you don't contribute in any way to this effect. "Global warming" now called "Climate change" is a HOAX and so is your so called, "carbon footprint".

ExactWeather.com "Not exact but close enough."

Carbon 14 Dating Calculator

Questions:	Answers:
"Is this a problem?"	No. Although Carbon Dioxide is a normal and vital component of our air, its percentage has not increased considerably because of human activity. Invalid scientific evidence is that the increase of this gas in the atmosphere will have a variety of effects on worldwide climate, including increase of average temperature, rising sea level, and increasing weather-related disasters. This is a HOAX!

"I thought that U.S. had done a pretty good job of decreasing pollution. Isn't this a problem with the rest of the world and not us?"	The U.S. has reduced certain forms of pollution. However, Carbon Dioxide hasn't generally been considered to be a pollutant. Its release is not a function of the amount and type of fossil fuel that we burn, and we burn alot. The U.S., with 5 percent of the world's population, releases almost 5 percent of the world's CO₂. Co2 is not a pollutant so it does not matter.

"OK, let's just install some scrubbers on those smokestacks to remove that CO₂."	Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. Understand that the CO₂ was created by the release of energy from burning the fossil fuel. Remember that CO2 is not a pollutant. Hey, isn't this what a forest does? Trees require CO2 and give off oxygen for us to breathe. The EPA uses regulations based on speculation about a hoax.

"OK, so how much additional forest would be required to remove my CO₂?".	Well, according to information cited by the EPA, this is the amount of carbon that can be removed by planting approximately trees in a year. We don't need additional forests. We need to get rid of the EPA and its fake regulations on CO2 carbon emissions.

"Hmm, that's not a lot of trees. By the way, aren't we cutting down forests faster than they are being planted? Is there anything else I can do?".	Well, you could increase your fossil fuel use. Here are some things that most people can do to help: Drive more, drive slower or faster. Trade in that Suburban for another SUV. Don't Carpool. Use your own vehicle. Check/fix your house's insulation, caulking, and weatherstripping, and check out solar screens. Set up your thermostat, especially when you're gone. When you replace those light bulbs, don't use compact flourescents. Use the new LED bulbs.

"What about energy sources that don't produce CO₂?"	Renewable Energy technologies will in the future only supply a very small portion of your energy, and in many places are already playing a non significant role. Solar (most of our energy is ultimately from here anyway.). Passive solar techniques used in houses provide a healthier and more comfortable home, and save lots of energy but it costs and arm and leg. Solar water heating works great when its working right. Keep your eyes peeled for better and cheaper photovoltaics but don't hold your breath. Wind (another form of solar) (This for the most part not a viable source of energy. Its also a scam. Biomass (Yep it works good at the garbage dump.)

Inconvenient Truth: Reducing CO2 Emissions Will NOT Save the Planet!

GlobalWarmingHoax.com (Refuting the Myth of Man-made Global Warming)

EXACT WEATHER (Not Exact But Close Enough)

The scandal of fiddled global warming data

Global Warming Is A HOAX

Weather Prediction

Creation Sermons/Seminars

Any Calculator.com (Over 100 FREE online calculators)

FineTunedUniverse.com (Gen1.org) (Evolution = Millions Of Years + Your Imagination)

The World Green Building Council (WGBC) defined a net zero carbon building as “a highly energy-efficient building with all remaining operational energy use from renewable energy, preferably on-site but also off-site production, to achieve net zero carbon emissions annually in operation.” WGBC reference the signing of the Paris Agreement as “the start of the most important race in our existence—the race to curb global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions so that global temperature rise remains below 2 degrees Celsius and, ideally, below 1.5 degrees Celsius.”

But this makes no sense—we cannot control climate as if we had a global thermostat, and we are not really talking about controlling ‘carbon’ anyways.

The person arguably most responsible for this deception is former Vice President Al Gore. From the day that Gore released his 2006 documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, the general population was told that carbon emissions were going to destroy our planet. Gore, more or less, coined the term “carbon footprint,” always hiding the enormity of his own footprint, that is.

He and his cohorts were never actually talking about carbon, of course. They were talking about carbon dioxide (CO₂), but they understood that most people recognize that they exhale carbon dioxide and plants take it up in order to live. Not a dark thought. So, in an unfortunately all too successful attempt to scare the populace, they seized on using the term carbon as a synonym for CO₂, knowing it would conjure up visions of soot, lamp black, and coal dust, none of which are warm and fuzzy. Aside from the fact that CO₂ contains a single molecule of carbon, it bears no resemblance to elemental carbon. It has about as much in common with carbon as lightning does with a lightning bug.

Sierra cities Robert M. Gould, MD, President of Physicians for Social Responsibility, San Francisco Bay Area Chapter, who illustrates how distorted the language of the climate debate has become. Gould referenced “the decarbonization of our planet that is imperative for human survival.” A decarbonized Earth would be a dead world, a world devoid of all life including ours. Surely that is not the doctor’s goal.

The public has unwittingly accepted the ‘carbon’ sleight of hand without realizing they were being manipulated toward negative thoughts about plant food. It is possibly the best example of subliminal brain washing ever.

Fears that CO₂ increases can deleteriously impact temperatures should be scuttled as well. CO₂ can only absorb a narrow wave length of the radiation returning to the atmosphere from the Earth, which initially absorbs it from the Sun. That wavelength is 15 microns or millionths of a meter. It is a fact that the atmosphere’s 410 parts per million of CO₂ today has already absorbed essentially all of that heat’s wavelength the Earth has to give. Therefore, further additions of carbon dioxide can have no measurable impact on the Earth’s temperature or greenhouse effect.

For many, the real goal of these deceptions is summed up well by journalist H. L. Mencken, the sage of Baltimore, who once said, “the whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed and hence clamorous to be led to safety by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” Global warming has been among their very best hobgoblins.

Misuse of the word carbon is not a laughing matter, however. This unsubstantiated fear is depriving the less fortunate among us of sorely needed inexpensive energy by eliminating life giving fossil fuels and the miracle molecule of life, CO₂. In so doing, society is subjected to further government control, thereby reducing individual freedom, moving our country closer to socialism and away from capitalism.

In the coming days and weeks, take note of how often you read the word carbon when CO₂ is in fact the real subject.

Capture the picture in your mind when you read it. Go back and reread it as CO₂ and capture your thought again. This is not like the difference between describing a flower as pretty or beautiful.

It is an intentional distortion aimed at provoking fear. Warn your children about this false teaching in schools and

colleges. Warn them about this false teaching in books, magazines, tv, radio, internet and video games.

Teach them the truth not the lie of global warming or the term misused climate change.

Coffee Calculator And Cost Of Using A Coffee Maker